AM Best warns global reinsurance faces soft market risk from record capital
AM Best identifies a critical juncture for global reinsurance as record capital levels threaten pricing discipline. The report highlights divergent strategies in casualty reinsurance and improved combined ratios for U.S., Bermuda, and European reinsurers. Key risks include social inflation, litigation funding, and potential irrational competition that could trigger a soft market cycle despite recent profitability.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The global reinsurance segment has reached a critical inflection point as record capital levels accumulated since 2023 now threaten to undermine pricing discipline, according to a new report by AM Best. The rating agency warns that growing competition, particularly in property lines, could lead to irrational behavior and trigger another traditional soft market cycle if reinsurers fail to resist the temptation to deploy their robust capital reserves aggressively. This shift marks a departure from previous hard markets, where capital accumulation occurred largely within existing organizations rather than through new entrants, giving established players multiple deployment options beyond single-channel underwriting.
The report, titled "Global Reinsurance at an Inflection Point: Can Discipline Survive the Temptation of Record Capital?", serves as the opening analysis in AM Best’s broader review of the industry ahead of the Rendez-Vous de Septembre in Monte Carlo. Additional reports covering top global reinsurance groups, insurance-linked securities (ILS), Lloyd’s, and regional markets will be released throughout August and September. The central theme across these analyses is whether the structural improvements in earnings and capitalization can be sustained without succumbing to competitive pressures that historically have reset market conditions.
Key Market Dynamics
| Market Segment | Key Trend | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| Property Reinsurance | Pricing pressure from record capital | Risk of soft market cycle if discipline fails |
| Casualty Reinsurance | Divergent strategies on growth vs. caution | Long-tail exposure risks from social inflation |
| US Property Catastrophe | Renewal reductions of 15% to 20% | Intensified hardening at April and midyear renewals |
| Combined Ratios | Improved to mid-80s/low-90s (US GAAP) | Recovery from underwriting losses in 2020 |
Casualty reinsurance has emerged as one of the most significant strategic concerns for the industry. While some organizations are pursuing growth opportunities by enhancing rates to bolster group premiums, others are adopting cautious approaches due to uncertainties surrounding social inflation, litigation funding, and larger jury awards. Dan Hofmeister, director at AM Best, noted that casualty exposures often develop over many years, meaning decisions made today may not be fully understood until well into the next decade. Consequently, maintaining pricing discipline in casualty business may prove as critical as preserving it within the property catastrophe market.
Analytical Observation: Capital Deployment Dilemma
The divergence in combined ratio performance highlights a broader structural shift in the reinsurance landscape. U.S. and Bermuda reinsurers have improved their combined ratios to the mid-80s to low-90s range under U.S. GAAP, recovering from underwriting loss positions in 2020. Similarly, European "Big Four" reinsurers reporting on an IFRS 17 basis have followed a comparable trend. However, this profitability creates a paradox: while strong results validate current underwriting strategies, they also generate the very capital that could fuel destructive competition. The challenge lies in balancing capital efficiency with pricing integrity, particularly as alternative capital markets like casualty-linked ILS remain relatively small compared to property catastrophe structures.
Michael Lagomarsino, senior director at AM Best, emphasized that if underwriting discipline and pricing integrity can be maintained despite record capital levels, the industry may be undergoing a meaningful evolution. If not, historical patterns suggest that fundamental dynamics of supply, demand, and competition remain persistent. AM Best expects favorable earnings profiles for non-life reinsurance barring outsized catastrophe events, but the sustainability of these results depends entirely on reinsurers’ ability to resist competitive pressures.
Other notable findings include the growing role of life reinsurance as a stable earnings stream for large global reinsurers, helping offset volatility elsewhere in portfolios. Additionally, artificial intelligence is poised to become a differentiating factor for organizations that successfully integrate technology, though limited and inconsistent data continue to hamper model effectiveness while increasing cyber and systemic risk exposure. AM Best will host its annual reinsurance market briefing at Rendez-Vous de Septembre on Sept. 6, 2026, at 10:15 a.m. (CEST) in Monte Carlo.
How might the upcoming April and midyear renewals serve as a stress test for reinsurers' ability to maintain pricing discipline amidst record capital levels?
What specific regulatory or structural changes could prevent the casualty reinsurance sector from succumbing to the long-tail risks associated with social inflation and litigation funding?
To what extent could the integration of artificial intelligence mitigate cyber and systemic risks, or does inconsistent data quality currently pose a greater threat to model reliability?

























