Akme Fintrade (India) Issues Clarifications on EGM Explanatory Statement Under SEBI Regulation 30
Akme Fintrade (India) Limited has filed clarifications under SEBI Regulation 30 regarding its EGM held on 20.03.2026, addressing observations on the Explanatory Statement. The company confirmed that Regulation 166A of the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 is not applicable as no allottee will hold 5% or more of the post-issue fully diluted share capital. A valuation report was obtained voluntarily under the Companies Act, 2013, with Mr. Shreyansh M Jain (IBBI R. No.: IBBI/RV/03/2019/12124) named as the valuer. The company also provided a direct link to the PCS Certificate as part of its regulatory disclosure.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
Akme Fintrade (India) Limited has filed a disclosure under Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015, providing clarifications and updates to the Explanatory Statement forming part of the Notice of its Extra-Ordinary General Meeting (EGM). The EGM in question was held on 20.03.2026, and the clarifications address specific observations raised with respect to the Notice, Explanatory Statement, and Corrigendum that were circulated to shareholders.
Non-Applicability of Regulation 166A
The company has clarified that Regulation 166A of the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 is not applicable to its proposed preferential issue. The key reason cited is that no allottee under the proposed allotment will hold 5% or more of the post-issue fully diluted share capital of the company. Consequently, the requirement to obtain a valuation report from an Independent Registered Valuer, as mandated under Regulation 166A, is not attracted in this case.
The company further stated that the issue price has been determined in compliance with the applicable provisions of Chapter V of the SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018 and other applicable laws. Therefore, disclosures relating to the applicability of Regulation 166A and an Independent Registered Valuer's valuation were not required to be included in the Notice and Explanatory Statement.
The following key details from the Explanatory Statement have been highlighted as part of the clarification:
| Parameter: | Details |
|---|---|
| Point (v) – Valuation Report: | To be read with Point (v) of the Corrigendum dated 12th March, 2026. The company obtained the Valuation Report on a voluntary basis in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013. |
| Point (viii) – Valuer Name & Address: | Mr. Shreyansh M Jain, Registered Valuer (IBBI R. No.: IBBI/RV/03/2019/12124), 102, Kautilya, F P No. 327, Khatodara, Surat - 395002, GJ, IN. |
Direct Link to PCS Certificate
In response to the observation pertaining to point no. (xxvii) of the Explanatory Statement, the company has provided the direct link to the PCS Certificate for shareholder and exchange reference. The certificate is accessible at:
https://www.akmefintrade.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/PCS-Certificate.pdf
The disclosure was signed by Manoj Kumar Choubisa, Company Secretary and Compliance Officer (M. No.: A66176), on behalf of Akme Fintrade (India) Limited, and has been submitted to both the National Stock Exchange of India Limited and BSE Limited for their records.
Historical Stock Returns for Akme Fintrade
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.77% | -0.11% | +7.02% | +22.15% | +29.91% | -32.61% |
How might the preferential issue affect Akme Fintrade's capital structure and ownership concentration if no single allottee crosses the 5% threshold?
What are the potential strategic objectives behind Akme Fintrade's preferential allotment, and how could the raised capital be deployed to impact future growth?
Could SEBI scrutinize the voluntary valuation report obtained under the Companies Act, 2013, and what precedent does this set for other NBFCs conducting similar preferential issues?


































