Bombay High Court Rejects Anil Ambani's Challenge to SBI's Fraud Classification of RCom Loan
The Bombay High Court has rejected Anil Ambani's petition challenging State Bank of India's decision to classify Reliance Communications Ltd. (RCom) loan account as fraudulent. The court found Ambani's petition lacked merit, upholding SBI's order to report him to the Reserve Bank of India under fraud risk management guidelines. SBI and RBI opposed Ambani's plea, stating that despite repeated notices, no satisfactory explanation was provided. This decision contrasts with a similar case where Canara Bank withdrew its fraud classification after Ambani's petition.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
In a significant legal development, the Bombay High Court has dismissed a petition filed by Anil Ambani, challenging the State Bank of India's (SBI) decision to classify Reliance Communications Ltd. (RCom) loan account as fraudulent.
Court Upholds SBI's Decision
The division bench of the Bombay High Court found that Ambani's petition lacked merit, effectively upholding SBI's order. This order not only designated RCom's account as fraudulent but also directed that Ambani be reported to the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) under fraud risk management guidelines.
Ambani's Arguments Rejected
Anil Ambani had contended that he was denied a personal hearing and access to key documents in the process. He argued that the classification violated principles of natural justice and would have drastic civil consequences. However, these arguments failed to sway the court.
SBI and RBI's Stance
Both SBI and RBI opposed Ambani's plea in court. They stated that repeated notices were served to Ambani, but no satisfactory explanation was provided. This lack of response appears to have strengthened the banks' position in the legal proceedings.
Potential Next Steps
With the High Court's dismissal of his petition, Ambani may now consider approaching the Supreme Court to challenge this decision.
Contrasting Outcome with Another Bank
Interestingly, this case stands in contrast to a similar situation with another bank. Canara Bank had previously withdrawn its fraud classification order after Ambani filed a petition. This divergence in outcomes highlights the complexity of such financial and legal matters.
Implications for RCom and Ambani
The court's decision could have significant implications for both Reliance Communications and Anil Ambani personally. The fraud classification of a loan account is a serious matter in the banking sector and can lead to various regulatory and financial consequences.
This development is part of the ongoing challenges faced by Anil Ambani and his companies in recent years, particularly in the telecom sector. The case underscores the increasing scrutiny of large corporate loans by Indian banks and regulators, especially in sectors facing financial stress.
Historical Stock Returns for Reliance Communications
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
+4.32% | +5.84% | +2.84% | -10.49% | -32.24% | 0.0% |