Sanofi Sarclisa subcutaneous formulation approved in Japan for multiple myeloma
Sanofi received approval from Japan's Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for its Sarclisa subcutaneous formulation to treat multiple myeloma. The approval is based on the IRAKLIA phase 3 study, which showed non-inferior efficacy and reduced infusion reactions compared to the intravenous version. A regulatory submission for the CirCLIQ on-body injector is currently under review in Japan.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in Japan has approved Sanofi ’s Sarclisa (isatuximab) subcutaneous (SC) formulation for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). This approval covers the use of Sarclisa SC in combination with standard-of-care regimens for both relapsed or refractory MM and newly diagnosed MM. The regulatory decision aims to ease treatment burden and enhance convenience for patients compared to intravenous administration.
The approved indications include combination with pomalidomide and dexamethasone (Pd), or with carfilzomib for relapsed or refractory MM, and combination with bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) for adult patients with newly diagnosed MM. A separate regulatory submission for the CirCLIQ on-body injector (OBI), based on the enFuse platform and submitted by Enable Injections, is under review in Japan. If approved, Sarclisa SC could become the first anticancer treatment in Japan administered via an OBI.
Approval was based on results from the pivotal IRAKLIA phase 3 study (clinical study identifier: NCT05405166), which evaluated the non-inferiority of Sarclisa SC administered via OBI versus Sarclisa IV. The study included adult patients with relapsed or refractory MM who had received at least one prior line of therapy.
Clinical Trial Results
The IRAKLIA study demonstrated that Sarclisa SC administered via an OBI in combination with Pd resulted in an objective response rate (ORR) of 71.1%, compared to 70.5% with Sarclisa IV-Pd. The statistical analysis established non-inferiority with a risk ratio of 1.008 (95% confidence interval: 0.903-1.126; p=0.0006).
| Metric | Sarclisa SC-Pd (OBI) | Sarclisa IV-Pd |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate | 71.1% | 70.5% |
| Infusion Reactions | 1.5% | 25% |
| Neutropenia (Grade ≥3) | 84.7% | 74.3% |
| Thrombocytopenia (Grade ≥3) | 26.1% | 23% |
| Anemia (Grade ≥3) | 17.6% | 19.5% |
| Pneumonia (Grade ≥3) | 14.8% | 15.5% |
The overall safety profile of Sarclisa SC-Pd was consistent with the established safety profile of Sarclisa IV-Pd. While 25% of patients treated with Sarclisa IV-Pd experienced infusion reactions, only 1.5% of patients treated with Sarclisa SC-Pd experienced those reactions. No new safety concerns were observed, except for low-grade local injection site reactions (ISRs) that occurred in 0.4% of OBI injections (n=19/5,145 injections). Nearly all ISRs were grade 1, except for one episode of grade 2.
Global Regulatory Status
This approval marks the second global approval for Sarclisa SC, following its approval in the EU in June 2026. In the EU, Sarclisa SC administered via both the CirCLIQ OBI and manual injection was approved for the treatment of MM patients across all currently approved indications for the Sarclisa IV formulation. An application for Sarclisa SC administered via both OBI and manual injection is currently under review in the US.
Olivier Nataf, Global Head of Oncology at Sanofi, stated that the approval represents an important evolution in care delivery, noting the potential for the treatment to become Japan's first anticancer therapy administered via an on-body injector.
Historical Stock Returns for Sanofi
| 1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| -0.88% | +6.22% | +4.51% | -18.04% | -44.85% | -56.10% |
How will the approval of Sarclisa SC impact Sanofi's market share in Japan's multiple myeloma treatment landscape?
What is the expected timeline for the CirCLIQ on-body injector's regulatory approval in Japan?
How might the adoption of Sarclisa SC influence pricing and reimbursement strategies in Japan's healthcare system?

































