Marushika Technology Limited Shareholders Approve Registered Office Shift With 100% Votes in Postal Ballot

3 min read     Updated on 13 May 2026, 11:21 AM
scanx
Reviewed by
Riya DScanX News Team
AI Summary

Marushika Technology Limited's postal ballot e-voting concluded on May 08, 2026, with shareholders passing a special resolution to shift the company's registered office from the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Companies, National Capital Territory of Delhi-I to that of Delhi-II. Out of a total of 85,36,768 shares, 50,99,694 votes were polled, representing a turnout of 59.74%, with 100.00% of valid votes cast in favour and zero votes against. The scrutinizer's report was submitted by Ajay Kumar of AASK & Associates LLP, and the outcome was filed with the National Stock Exchange of India Limited on May 12, 2026.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
40197084

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Marushika Technology Limited has successfully concluded its postal ballot e-voting process, with shareholders approving a special resolution for the shifting of the company's registered office. The e-voting window closed at 05:00 P.M. on May 08, 2026, which was deemed the date of passing of the resolution. The outcome was communicated to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited on May 12, 2026, in compliance with Regulation 44(3) of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015.

Resolution Approved: Registered Office Jurisdiction Change

The sole agenda item put to vote sought member approval for shifting the registered office of the company from the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Companies, National Capital Territory of Delhi-I to the jurisdiction of the Registrar of Companies, National Capital Territory of Delhi-II. The resolution was classified as a Special Resolution, and the promoter/promoter group was declared as not interested in the agenda. The Postal Ballot Notice was originally dated March 30, 2026, and dispatched to eligible members on April 07, 2026. The cut-off date for determining eligible shareholders was Friday, April 03, 2026, on which date the total number of shareholders stood at 210.

Voting Results at a Glance

The e-voting was conducted through the platform of National Securities Depository Limited (NSDL), which was disabled on May 08, 2026 at 05:00 P.M. The votes were unblocked in the presence of two independent witnesses. A total of 6 members participated in remote e-voting, casting 50,99,694 valid votes, all of which were in favour of the resolution. There were no votes against, and no invalid votes were recorded.

The category-wise voting breakdown for the special resolution is presented below:

Category: No. of Shares Held No. of Votes Polled % Votes Polled on Outstanding Shares No. of Votes – In Favour No. of Votes – Against % Votes in Favour on Votes Polled % Votes Against on Votes Polled
Promoter and Promoter Group (Total): 49,67,339 49,67,339 100.00 49,67,339 0.00 100.00 0.00
Public – Institutions (Total): 11,67,600 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Public – Non Institutions (Total): 24,01,829 1,32,355 5.51 1,32,355 0.00 100.00 0.00
Overall Total: 85,36,768 50,99,694 59.74 50,99,694 0.00 100.00 0.00

Scrutinizer's Report and Process Compliance

The scrutinizer for the postal ballot process was Ajay Kumar (Membership No. ACS-64324), Partner of AASK & Associates LLP, Practicing Company Secretaries, New Delhi. The votes were unblocked on May 08, 2026 at approximately 05:02 P.M. in the presence of two witnesses — Mr. Abhishek Gupta and Ms. Priya Aggarwal — both of whom are not in the employment of the company. The scrutinizer confirmed that all e-voting communications received up to the close of working hours on May 08, 2026 were considered, and the report was generated and scrutinized thereafter.

Key procedural details of the postal ballot process are summarised below:

Parameter: Details
Postal Ballot Notice Date: March 30, 2026
Dispatch Completed On: April 07, 2026
Cut-off Date: April 03, 2026
Total Shareholders on Cut-off Date: 210
E-voting Closure: May 08, 2026, 05:00 P.M.
Resolution Deemed Passed On: May 08, 2026
Scrutinizer: Ajay Kumar, ACS-64324, AASK & Associates LLP
UDIN: A064324H000340974

Outcome and Filing

Based on the scrutinizer's consolidated report, the special resolution for shifting the registered office was passed with the requisite majority in accordance with Section 110 of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 22 of the Companies (Management and Administration) Rules, 2014. The results were countersigned by Monicca Agarwaal, Managing Director and Chairperson (DIN: 02718537), and filed with the exchanges on May 12, 2026. The voting results and scrutinizer's report are also available on the company's website at www.marushika.in .

Historical Stock Returns for Marushika Technology

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+0.06%-10.26%-8.55%-24.43%-24.43%-24.43%

What operational or strategic advantages does Marushika Technology expect to gain by shifting its registered office from RoC Delhi-I to RoC Delhi-II jurisdiction?

Given that institutional shareholders holding 11,67,600 shares recorded zero participation in the e-voting, what does this level of institutional disengagement signal about investor confidence in the company's governance?

Will the registered office jurisdiction change trigger any regulatory filings, tax implications, or compliance requirements that could impact Marushika Technology's near-term operational costs?

Marushika Technology Limited Pays Penalty for Filing Non-Compliance

2 min read     Updated on 09 May 2026, 12:42 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Riya DScanX News Team
AI Summary

Marushika Technology Limited paid a penalty of Rs. 53,400 to the Registrar of Companies, Delhi I, for non-compliance with Section 137(3) of the Companies Act, 2013. The violation involved filing the wrong form (AOC-4 instead of AOC-4 CFS) for FY 2023-24 and missing the filing deadline. Penalties were also imposed on two officers, Ms. Sonika Aggarwal and Ms. Monicca Agarwaal.

powered bylight_fuzz_icon
39856323

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Marushika Technology Limited has informed the National Stock Exchange of India Limited that it has paid a penalty following an adjudication order passed by the Registrar of Companies (ROC), Delhi I. The order, dated May 08, 2026, was issued under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013, addressing defaults related to Section 137(3) of the same Act.

The company had previously received a Show Cause Notice from the ROC Delhi I on April 23, 2026. In response, Marushika Technology filed a reply on April 28, 2026, accepting the non-compliance. The management stated that the default occurred due to an inadvertent oversight and requested leniency, noting that the violation was unintentional. They also requested a physical hearing on May 04, 2026; however, the competent authority determined that a hearing was not necessary.

Details of the Violation

The specific violation identified by the authorities concerns the filing requirements for the financial year 2023-24. The company was required to file Form AOC-4 CFS under Section 137 of the Companies Act, 2013. Instead, Marushika Technology filed Form AOC-4, bearing SRN N07262520 dated October 25, 2024. Furthermore, the company failed to file the requisite Form AOC-4 CFS within the prescribed time limit of 30 days from the date of the Annual General Meeting (AGM) held on September 25, 2024.

Penalty and Financial Impact

Pursuant to the adjudication order, a monetary penalty was imposed on the company and its officers in default. The company has reviewed the order and confirmed that the penalty has been paid.

Authority Registrar of Companies, ROC Delhi I
Order ID PO/ADJ/05-2026/DL/02103
Date of Order 08 May, 2026
Penalty on Company Rs. 53,400
Penalty on Officers Rs. 50,000 each (Ms. Sonika Aggarwal, Director and Ms. Monicca Agarwaal, Managing Director)
Total Impact Rs. 53,400 (Rupees Fifty-Three Thousand and Four Hundred)

The disclosure was made to the exchange in compliance with Regulation 30 of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015. The company confirmed that the requisite disclosure, including the details of the adjudication order, was enclosed as Annexure A to the letter sent to the exchange.

Historical Stock Returns for Marushika Technology

1 Day5 Days1 Month6 Months1 Year5 Years
+0.06%-10.26%-8.55%-24.43%-24.43%-24.43%

Will Marushika Technology implement stronger internal compliance mechanisms to prevent similar filing oversights in future financial years?

Could this regulatory penalty impact investor confidence or the company's stock performance on the NSE in the near term?

Are there any broader implications for the directors personally, such as disqualification risks or reputational impact, following the individual penalties imposed on Ms. Sonika Aggarwal and Ms. Monicca Agarwaal?

1 Year Returns:-24.43%