ARSS Infrastructure Projects Clarifies Audit Qualification Signature Omission in FY26 Financial Results Filing
ARSS Infrastructure Projects Limited clarified to the NSE that the missing Audit Committee Chairman's signature in its FY26 Statement of Impact of Audit Qualifications was inadvertent, with a corrected filing submitted on 30 May 2026. The auditors issued a qualified opinion citing non-compliance with Ind AS 115, overstatement of exceptional items and net worth by Rs. 70,831.96 Lakhs due to improper recognition of arbitration claims, and incorrect borrowing classification and interest expense of Rs. 1,122.76 Lakhs. The financial year also saw the implementation of a Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT on 29 August 2025, resulting in exceptional items of ₹3,22,971.31 Lakhs and a substantially restructured balance sheet.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
ARSS Infrastructure Projects Limited has submitted a clarification to the National Stock Exchange of India Limited (NSE) in response to an observation that the Statement of Impact of Audit Qualifications, submitted along with its annual audited standalone financial results for the financial year ended 31 March 2026, was not in the format prescribed by SEBI.
Inadvertent Omission and Corrective Action
The company acknowledged that while submitting the outcome of the Board Meeting along with the financial results on 30 May 2026 (Exchange acknowledgement time: 19:38:07), the Statement of Impact of Audit Qualifications was inadvertently submitted without the signature of the Chairman of the Audit Committee. The company clarified that this omission was purely inadvertent and unintentional and was not deliberate in any manner.
Upon noticing the omission, the company submitted a revised disclosure containing the duly signed Statement of Impact of Audit Qualifications through the General Update filing path on the Exchange portal on the same day, i.e., 30 May 2026 (Exchange acknowledgement time: 22:02:06). The revised disclosure is available on the NSE archives portal.
Auditors' Qualified Opinion — Key Findings
The statutory auditors, ADV and Co LLP, Chartered Accountants, issued a qualified opinion on the standalone financial results for the quarter and year ended 31 March 2026. The audit report highlighted three primary bases for the qualified opinion, as summarised below:
| Qualification No. | Details | Financial Impact |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Non-compliance with Ind AS 115 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers; contract-wise surplus/deficit on construction contracts neither ascertained nor recognised | Not quantified |
| 2 | Recognition of arbitration claims as income and as Claims Receivable under Other Financial Assets, contrary to Ind AS 115, Ind AS 109, and Ind AS 37 | Rs. 70,831.96 Lakhs — overstatement of exceptional items, other financial assets, and net worth |
| 3 | Incorrect classification of a loan from Ocean Capital Market Limited as "Secured Borrowing" and accrual of interest at 9% per annum without requisite approvals or security creation | Rs. 1,122.76 Lakhs — incorrect classification of borrowings and interest expense |
Qualification 1: Non-Compliance with Ind AS 115
The auditors noted that in the absence of relevant contract-wise records and underlying project documentation, contract-wise surplus or deficit on construction contracts has neither been ascertained nor recognised in compliance with Ind AS 115 — Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This qualification has been raised continuously since Financial Year 2013-14. Management acknowledged that the compliance of Ind AS 115 could not be completed due to the absence of certain material information relating to contracts from the period of the erstwhile management, and that unpredictable variations in reliable estimation of revenue and cost further precluded quantification.
Qualification 2: Recognition of Arbitration Claims
The auditors flagged that the company recognised arbitration claims amounting to Rs. 70,831.96 Lakhs as income in the Statement of Profit and Loss and as Claims Receivable under Other Financial Assets in the Balance Sheet. The auditors held that such recognition was not in accordance with applicable Indian Accounting Standards, as:
- Under Ind AS 115, variable consideration subject to arbitration can be included in the transaction price only when it is highly probable that a significant reversal of cumulative revenue recognised will not occur — a threshold not met for claims with uncertain outcomes.
- Under Ind AS 109, recognition of a financial asset requires an unconditional contractual right to receive cash, which most unadjudicated arbitration claims do not satisfy.
- Under Ind AS 37, such claims constitute contingent assets, the recognition of which is expressly prohibited until the inflow of economic benefits is virtually certain.
Management, in its response, stated that the new management reviewed the company's books alongside ongoing arbitration proceedings and that the company has received favourable orders in a significant portion of these proceedings, with legal consultants providing a high probability assessment of successful collection.
Qualification 3: Loan Classification and Interest Accrual
The auditors raised concerns regarding the classification of a loan received from Ocean Capital Market Limited (Successful Resolution Applicant), a related party, as a "Secured Borrowing" in the Balance Sheet as at 31 March 2026, with interest accrued at 9% per annum. The specific concerns were:
- No security creation documents had been executed as at the balance sheet date, and no charge had been registered with the Registrar of Companies.
- The approved Resolution Plan sanctioned by the Hon'ble NCLT does not contemplate payment of interest on this loan.
- Requisite approvals for this related party transaction under Section 177 and Section 188 of the Companies Act, 2013, and Regulation 23 of SEBI (LODR) Regulations, 2015, had not been demonstrated.
These matters resulted in incorrect classification of borrowings and incorrect recognition of interest expense to the tune of Rs. 1,122.76 Lakhs. Management clarified that the charge will be filed at the earliest and that the Audit Committee and Board of Directors duly considered and approved the transaction before finalisation of the financial statements for FY 2025-26.
Key Financial Metrics — Impact of Audit Qualifications
The Statement on Impact of Audit Qualifications presents the following comparison between audited figures as reported and adjusted figures after accounting for qualifications:
| Metric | Audited Figures (Amount in Lakhs) | Adjusted Figures (Amount in Lakhs) |
|---|---|---|
| Turnover / Total Income | 15326.08 | 15326.08 |
| Total Expenditure | 27173.32 | 26050.56 |
| Net Profit / (Loss) | (355498.04) | (425207.93) |
| Earnings Per Share | (394.48) | (394.48) |
| Total Assets | 127731.05 | 56899.09 |
| Total Liabilities | 31762.90 | 31762.90 |
| Net Worth | 95968.15 | 26258.95 |
Emphasis of Matter — Resolution Plan Implementation
The auditors also drew attention to several significant matters, without modifying their opinion on these points. The Resolution Plan submitted by Ocean Capital Market Limited was approved by the Hon'ble National Company Law Tribunal, Cuttack Bench, vide order dated 29 August 2025. Key outcomes of the Resolution Plan included reconstitution of the Board of Directors, extinguishment of erstwhile promoter equity, settlement and restructuring of financial and operational creditor liabilities, conversion of unsustainable debt into equity, fresh equity infusion by the Successful Resolution Applicant, and recognition of net loss as Exceptional Items of ₹3,22,971.31 Lakhs in the Statement of Profit and Loss for the year.
The auditors further noted that the financial statements for the year ended 31 March 2026 are not strictly comparable with the previous year, as the figures for the comparative period (year ended 31 March 2025) were prepared during the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process, when the powers of the Board of Directors were vested with the Resolution Professional. Additionally, the company wrote off Rs. 91,273.71 Lakhs of arbitration claims previously stated as Claims Receivable under Other Financial Assets.
The clarification letter was signed by Gopal Krishna Dash, Managing Director (DIN: 10776309), on 17 July 2026.
How does the new management intend to resolve the long-standing Ind AS 115 non-compliance issue that has persisted since FY 2013-14?
What is the expected timeline for the adjudication of the Rs. 70,831.96 Lakhs in arbitration claims, and how will a potential adverse ruling impact liquidity?
Will the company restate its financial statements to address the auditors' concerns regarding the incorrect classification of the Ocean Capital Market loan and interest accrual?
































