SEBI Clears Adani Group in Hindenburg Case as Delhi Court Quashes Gag Order
A Rohini Court in New Delhi has lifted a gag order that restricted journalists from publishing content about Adani Enterprises. The court ruled that journalists should have been given a chance to present their case before takedown orders were issued. Simultaneously, SEBI's final order cleared Adani Group companies of allegations related to the Hindenburg case, imposing no penalties. The original gag order was part of a defamation suit filed by Adani Enterprises, claiming negative coverage had damaged its reputation and business prospects.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
In a significant development for press freedom, a Rohini Court in New Delhi has overturned a gag order that had previously restricted journalists from publishing allegedly unverified and defamatory content about Adani Enterprises . This ruling comes as the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) issued a final order stating that allegations against the Adani Group related to the Hindenburg case could not be established.
Court's Ruling and SEBI's Decision
The court determined that the journalists should have been given an opportunity to present their case before the issuance of takedown orders. This decision marks a crucial turn in the ongoing legal battle between Adani Enterprises and several journalists.
Simultaneously, SEBI's final order cleared Adani Ports & Special Economic Zone Ltd., Adani Power Ltd., and Adani Enterprises Ltd. of any liabilities in the Hindenburg case. The regulator imposed no penalties, stating that the allegations against the Adani Group could not be substantiated.
Background of the Case
The case involves prominent journalists including Ravi Nair, Abir Dasgupta, Ayaskant Das, Ayush Joshi, and Paranjoy Guha Thakurta, among other defendants. The original gag order was issued as part of a defamation suit filed by Adani Enterprises.
Original Gag Order
The initial order had directed the defendants to remove contentious material from websites, articles, and social media platforms within a specified timeframe. This sweeping directive had raised concerns about press freedom and the right to report on matters of public interest.
Adani Enterprises' Claims
Adani Enterprises had argued that repeated negative coverage, including references to the 2023 Hindenburg report, had significantly impacted the company. The company claimed this coverage had:
- Damaged its reputation
- Delayed projects
- Eroded investor confidence
- Hurt global fundraising efforts
Implications of the Rulings
The court's decision to quash the gag order is likely to be seen as a victory for press freedom in India. It underscores the importance of allowing journalists to report on matters of public interest, even when such reporting may be unfavorable to large corporations.
Meanwhile, SEBI's clearance of the Adani Group in the Hindenburg case provides a significant boost to the conglomerate's credibility in the face of previous allegations.
These rulings may set precedents for similar cases in the future, potentially influencing how courts and regulatory bodies balance the rights of corporations to protect their reputations against the fundamental right to freedom of speech and expression, as well as how they investigate and adjudicate on complex financial matters.
As these legal and regulatory developments continue to unfold, they will be closely watched by media outlets, legal experts, corporate entities, and investors alike, given their potential implications for press freedom, corporate accountability, and market integrity in India.
Historical Stock Returns for Adani Enterprises
1 Day | 5 Days | 1 Month | 6 Months | 1 Year | 5 Years |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0.0% | +0.13% | +2.93% | +4.05% | -18.75% | +723.87% |