NCLAT Partially Relieves Meta and WhatsApp in Competition Case, Upholds ₹213 Crore Penalty
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) upheld a ₹213.14 crore penalty on Meta Platforms and WhatsApp but overturned findings related to WhatsApp's market dominance. The tribunal removed a five-year ban on user-data sharing for advertising purposes, recognizing potential threats to WhatsApp's free-to-use business model. While maintaining the penalty, NCLAT's decision provides partial relief by lifting the data-sharing ban and overturning dominance findings. The ruling suggests data protection issues may fall outside the Competition Commission of India's jurisdiction.

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) has delivered a mixed verdict for Meta Platforms and its subsidiary WhatsApp in a high-profile competition case. The case revolves around WhatsApp's 2021 privacy policy update, which sparked controversy and regulatory scrutiny.
Key Rulings
Penalty Upheld: The NCLAT maintained the ₹213.14 crore penalty imposed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI).
Dominance Finding Overturned: The tribunal overturned key findings related to WhatsApp's dominant position in the market.
Data Sharing Ban Removed: A significant five-year ban on user-data sharing for advertising purposes was lifted.
Background of the Case
The CCI had previously found that WhatsApp allegedly abused its dominant market position by:
- Forcing a mandatory update to its privacy policy
- Requiring users to share data with other Meta entities
- Removing the previous option for users to opt out of data sharing
NCLAT's Decision Breakdown
| Aspect | NCLAT Ruling |
|---|---|
| CCI Penalty | Upheld |
| Dominance Findings | Overturned |
| Data Sharing Ban | Removed |
| Section 4(2)(e) of Competition Act | Struck down related aspects |
| Other CCI Directions | Preserved |
Implications for Meta and WhatsApp
Business Model Preservation: The NCLAT recognized Meta's argument that the data-sharing ban could threaten WhatsApp's free-to-use business model.
Jurisdictional Clarity: The tribunal suggested that data protection issues may fall outside the CCI's jurisdiction, potentially limiting future interventions by the competition watchdog in data-related matters.
Partial Relief: While the substantial penalty remains, the removal of the data-sharing ban and overturning of dominance findings provide significant relief to Meta and WhatsApp.
This ruling represents a nuanced approach to balancing competition law with the realities of data-driven business models in the digital age. It also highlights the complex interplay between competition law and data protection regulations, suggesting a need for clearer demarcation of regulatory jurisdictions in the evolving digital landscape.
As the case concludes, both regulators and tech companies will likely be analyzing its implications for future policy updates and business practices in the Indian market.








































