Google Agrees to $30 Million Settlement in YouTube Children's Privacy Lawsuit

1 min read     Updated on 20 Aug 2025, 02:30 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Anirudha BasakBy ScanX News Team
whatsapptwittershare
Overview

Google has reached a preliminary $30 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging violation of children's privacy on YouTube. The case involves collecting personal information of U.S. children under 13 without parental consent for targeted advertising between July 2013 and April 2020. If approved, 35-45 million class members could receive $30-$60 each. Google denies wrongdoing despite the settlement. This follows a previous $170 million fine paid to the FTC and New York Attorney General in 2019 for similar allegations.

17226022

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

In a significant development concerning online privacy for children, Google has reached a preliminary agreement to pay $30.00 million to settle a class action lawsuit. The lawsuit alleged that the tech giant violated children's privacy on its YouTube platform by collecting personal information without parental consent and using it for targeted advertising.

Settlement Details

The settlement, which is yet to receive final approval, covers United States children under the age of 13 who watched YouTube between July 1, 2013, and April 1, 2020. This potentially affects 35-45 million class members, highlighting the widespread impact of the case.

Allegations and Background

Parents of 34 children accused Google of violating state laws by allowing content providers to use cartoons and nursery rhymes to help collect personal data. This lawsuit followed Google's 2019 settlement with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and New York Attorney General, which resulted in $170.00 million in fines.

Potential Payout

If the settlement is approved and 1-2% of class members submit claims, individual payouts could range from $30.00 to $60.00 before legal fees. The lawyers involved in the case are seeking up to $9.00 million from the settlement amount.

Google's Stance

Despite agreeing to the settlement, Google has denied any wrongdoing in the matter. This stance is common in such settlements, where companies often choose to resolve cases without admitting liability.

Implications for Online Privacy

This settlement underscores the ongoing concerns about children's privacy in the digital age. It highlights the need for stricter enforcement of privacy laws, especially when it comes to protecting minors online. The case also serves as a reminder for tech companies to be vigilant about their data collection and usage practices, particularly when their platforms are accessible to children.

What's Next

The settlement still requires final approval from the court. If approved, it will provide some compensation to affected families and potentially lead to improved privacy practices on YouTube and other online platforms popular among children.

This case serves as another chapter in the ongoing dialogue about digital privacy, the responsibilities of tech giants, and the protection of vulnerable internet users, especially children.

like17
dislike

Google to Pay A$55 Million Fine for Anti-Competitive Practices in Australia

1 min read     Updated on 18 Aug 2025, 02:58 PM
scanx
Reviewed by
Shraddha JoshiBy ScanX News Team
whatsapptwittershare
Overview

Google has agreed to pay A$55 million (US$35.80 million) in fines to Australian regulators for anti-competitive practices. The company made deals with Telstra and Optus to pre-install Google's search app on Android phones in exchange for ad revenue sharing, limiting rival search engines. Google has admitted to impacting competition and ceased such agreements. The fine is subject to Federal Court approval. The case highlights increasing global scrutiny of tech giants' market practices.

17054889

*this image is generated using AI for illustrative purposes only.

Google, the tech giant, has agreed to pay A$55 million (approximately US$35.80 million) in fines to Australian regulators following findings that the company engaged in anti-competitive practices through deals with major telecommunications providers Telstra and Optus.

Details of the Anti-Competitive Arrangements

The arrangements in question, which were in effect from late 2019 to early 2021, involved Google sharing advertising revenue with Telstra and Optus. In exchange, these telcos pre-installed Google's search application on Android phones, effectively limiting the presence of rival search engines on these devices.

Google's Admission and Resolution

Google has admitted that these deals substantially impacted competition in the Australian market. As part of the resolution, the company has ceased signing similar agreements, demonstrating a commitment to addressing the regulators' concerns.

Regulatory Perspective

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) has stated that this resolution could provide millions of Australians with greater search choice on their mobile devices. This outcome aligns with the regulator's mission to promote fair competition and protect consumer interests.

Financial Impact and Next Steps

The agreed-upon fine of A$55 million is subject to approval by the Federal Court of Australia. This amount, while significant, represents a small fraction of Google's global revenue.

Google's Response

In response to the settlement, Google expressed satisfaction in resolving the regulator's concerns. The company noted that the provisions found to be anti-competitive have not been part of their commercial agreements for some time.

Implications for the Tech Industry

This case highlights the increasing scrutiny faced by tech giants globally regarding their market practices. It serves as a reminder of the importance of maintaining fair competition in the digital marketplace, especially in sectors where a few large players hold significant market power.

As regulatory bodies worldwide continue to examine the practices of major tech companies, this settlement in Australia could set a precedent for similar cases in other jurisdictions, potentially influencing how tech companies structure their partnerships and agreements in the future.

like18
dislike
Explore Other Articles